Lets take
The guy is a popular blogger, but he is shifting into the phase where funny references and pointless banter seem to be the focus rather than a good review. He does not bother with a good review, rather he sticks to just pick apart the new version. Being a critic, thats the easiest thing to do, actually thats what some people are specialists at( Yes, that means you Shankar).
I could go on and on about why this new version is going to fail, but I ll do something different here. I ll tell you why this is bad compared to the previous version.
Firstly, MSMT was launched on Doordarshan. Cable TV was not launched until 1992(if my memory serves me correctly). So people had to make do watching Doordarshan and this song came on every 2 hours. So the more people heard it , the more they liked it. People didnt have the luxury of turning away from a 5 minute song in those days. So people had to sit through it. I dont mean to take credit away from the quality of the original, but playing something repeatedly does make you like it.
Secondly, the background visuals, A fcking amazing. 1.0 clearly trumps 2.0 on this. The locations are excellent. Its natural,plush and green and completely non artificial. Its a colorful delight.The new version starts off with ARR playing the continuum (his new favorite instrument)with buildings in the background and Amitabh B standing near the Taj hotels of the Mumbai attacks. I understand the sentiments behind it, but the Taj hotels has become a symbol of sadness and gloom. So you are basically making the watcher feel depressed at the beginning of the video, BADDDDD start.
Next, MSMT was 5 mins 48 seconds , PMSMT is fucking 16 minutes 26 seconds. I dont know which fucknut was directing this(I wikied it and saw its Kailesh Surendranath, the guy who did the first one as well). The reason for this is the money that has gone into the production of this song. MSMT was such a huge hit, that producers wanted a longer better video with more people involved.Anyone with half a brain would know that no one`s going to listen to 16 minute song. Market research and common sense was clearly lacking.
One point which everyone seems to be making is "where is the passion?". The end of Mile Sur Mera Tumhara is amazing. People running over, wearing the Indian Tricolor and forming the Indian flag. It totally works. After the agonizingly long 16 minutes, they just show the flag fluttering in the wind. Theres absolutely no human connection here. The kids wear tri color uniforms and the sportsmen in the end wear the tricolors as well, but clearly does not compare to connection made at the end of the previous version.
And here it is the , the biggest fail.: 4 sportsmen ,50 people from the film industry in the video(check stats here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mile_sur_mera_tumhara). My god, this is ultimately projected to be a saucy music video.Again, influence of money. When you have so much money, its easy to get everyone you to make your video appealing. The producers are basically appealing to every actor fan base there is. In the original version, many famous actors and actresses were filmed together and given one screen. In this hes given individual shots to all actors. So being lenient to the Director, maybe the fail for this wasnt totally his fault. Its probably how it is Indian Cinema these days. Many people keep saying how Sachin and Tatas or the Ambanis werent a part of it. My guess is either they didnt have the time to film or probably cost way too much. The focus of this video definitely seems to be for the actor fan bases.
Okay, at this point I am going to give the video some credit. One thing they did focus on although after a sleep inducing 14 minutes, was shots of the army. As an Indian, I am very proud of our nations army.I think this was something the first video missed. Also, there was some screen for our country`s unsung sportsmen. People like Abhinav Bindra, Vijendar Singh,Sushil Kumar and some lady( I dont know her name, google it).Instead of flooding the screen with our usual brand ambassadors like Dravid, Sachin and Ganguly, they have given time for some unknown players.
One thing to note in India is, remakes in India are never going to be a hit, no matter how good they really are. The best example of this is DON. For a remake, this is as good as its going to get. People in India are`nt just open to the idea of remakes. They are always going to be compared to the previous version. In a way this is a good thing, as Hollywood seems to be killing creativity with movie sequels, story book adaptations and reboots(i.e. Killing the story all together and writing a whole new version of it, e.g. Batman, after the debacle of Batman and Robin, they "rebooted" it with "Batman begins".)
Ultimately, I know I have written a very negative article, but I still like the idea of remaking a classic.The idea is to connect with the audience of this generation. Most of the actors in the previous video are way past their prime.Slowly and steadily like a Rehmann song people will warm up to this new version. Its got all your favourite stars and people will forgive the director for making it too filmish. The old version had no OOMPH factor to it. This will be the ultimate bro video thanks to Aishwarya B, Priyanka and Deepika Padukone (the reason why she might have actually been in this video is because her father, Prakash was in the original version, so touch of irony from the director.. well that and she s downright hot).
Note: I dont want to write too much about what the actors are doing because clearly I am out of space, time and am not educationally qualified to say what should have been done.
Note: I dont want to write too much about what the actors are doing because clearly I am out of space, time and am not educationally qualified to say what should have been done.